IOVA vs KLRS

Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. vs Kalaris Therapeutics, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

IOVA

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Quality
5.1
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$4.10
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

KLRS

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Kalaris Therapeutics, Inc.
Quality
4.1
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$5.27
Last close
Models
7/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType IOVA Fair ValueIOVA Upside KLRS Fair ValueKLRS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.12 -72.7% $0.38 -92.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.72 -78.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $1.69 -58.8% $1.17 -77.7%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for IOVA vs KLRS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

IOVA vs KLRS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IOVA scores higher with a 5.1/10 quality rating vs KLRS's 4.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. (IOVA) and Kalaris Therapeutics, Inc. (KLRS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

IOVA currently trades at $4.10 with a QOC of 5.1/10, while KLRS trades at $5.27 with a QOC of 4.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).