IOR vs IRT

Income Opportunity Realty Inves vs Independence Realty Trust, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

IOR

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Income Opportunity Realty Inves
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
10
SAFE
Price
$18.00
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

IRT

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Independence Realty Trust, Inc.
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$16.23
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType IOR Fair ValueIOR Upside IRT Fair ValueIRT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.94 -72.5% $3.55 -78.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.96 -72.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $5.09 -71.7% $37.99 +134.1%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for IOR vs IRT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

IOR vs IRT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IRT scores higher with a 8.4/10 quality rating vs IOR's 5.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Income Opportunity Realty Inves (IOR) and Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

IOR currently trades at $18.00 with a QOC of 5.7/10, while IRT trades at $16.23 with a QOC of 8.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).