INTR vs ISBA

Inter & Co. Inc. vs Isabella Bank Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

INTR

Banks - Regional
Inter & Co. Inc.
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$6.34
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

ISBA

Banks - Regional
Isabella Bank Corporation
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$41.13
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType INTR Fair ValueINTR Upside ISBA Fair ValueISBA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $6.66 +5.1% $41.52 +0.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $5.48 -13.6% $27.98 -32.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for INTR vs ISBA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

INTR vs ISBA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ISBA scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs INTR's 8.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Inter & Co. Inc. (INTR) and Isabella Bank Corporation (ISBA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

INTR currently trades at $6.34 with a QOC of 8.6/10, while ISBA trades at $41.13 with a QOC of 8.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).