INR vs KRP

Infinity Natural Resources, Inc vs Kimbell Royalty Partners — Valuation Comparison 2026

INR

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Infinity Natural Resources, Inc
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$13.55
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

KRP

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Kimbell Royalty Partners
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$15.01
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType INR Fair ValueINR Upside KRP Fair ValueKRP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $27.34 +82.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.25 -71.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $18.20 +12.4% $12.65 -15.7%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $15.40 -4.9% $0.24 -98.4%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for INR vs KRP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

INR vs KRP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KRP scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs INR's 6.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Infinity Natural Resources, Inc (INR) and Kimbell Royalty Partners (KRP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

INR currently trades at $13.55 with a QOC of 6.8/10, while KRP trades at $15.01 with a QOC of 8.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).