INOD vs KD

Innodata Inc. vs Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

INOD

Information Technology Services
Innodata Inc.
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$99.35
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

KD

Information Technology Services
Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
16
SAFE
Price
$11.78
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType INOD Fair ValueINOD Upside KD Fair ValueKD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $9.89 -90.0% $0.63 -94.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $14.27 -85.6% $1.44 -87.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for INOD vs KD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

INOD vs KD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

INOD scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs KD's 7.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Innodata Inc. (INOD) and Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

INOD currently trades at $99.35 with a QOC of 9.7/10, while KD trades at $11.78 with a QOC of 7.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).