III vs INOD

Information Services Group, Inc vs Innodata Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

III

Information Technology Services
Information Services Group, Inc
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
29
LOW
Price
$4.53
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

INOD

Information Technology Services
Innodata Inc.
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$99.35
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType III Fair ValueIII Upside INOD Fair ValueINOD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.78 -38.7% $9.89 -90.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.20 -73.6% $14.27 -85.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for III vs INOD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

III vs INOD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

INOD scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs III's 8.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Information Services Group, Inc (III) and Innodata Inc. (INOD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

III currently trades at $4.53 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while INOD trades at $99.35 with a QOC of 9.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).