IDXX vs IMDX

IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. vs Insight Molecular Diagnostics I — Valuation Comparison 2026

IDXX

Diagnostics & Research
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$568.03
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

IMDX

Diagnostics & Research
Insight Molecular Diagnostics I
Quality
5.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$6.53
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType IDXX Fair ValueIDXX Upside IMDX Fair ValueIMDX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $201.05 -64.6% $2.19 -66.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $129.30 -77.2% $1.19 -71.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for IDXX vs IMDX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

IDXX vs IMDX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IDXX scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs IMDX's 5.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. (IDXX) and Insight Molecular Diagnostics I (IMDX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

IDXX currently trades at $568.03 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while IMDX trades at $6.53 with a QOC of 5.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).