IDCC vs JYNT

InterDigital, Inc. vs The Joint Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

IDCC

Patent Owners & Lessors
InterDigital, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$252.09
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

JYNT

Patent Owners & Lessors
The Joint Corp.
Quality
7.0
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$8.90
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType IDCC Fair ValueIDCC Upside JYNT Fair ValueJYNT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $318.22 +26.2% $3.36 -62.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $188.81 -25.1% $2.01 -77.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for IDCC vs JYNT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

IDCC vs JYNT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IDCC scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs JYNT's 7.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) and The Joint Corp. (JYNT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

IDCC currently trades at $252.09 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while JYNT trades at $8.90 with a QOC of 7.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).