HVII vs SPRU

Hennessy Capital Investment Cor vs Spruce Power Holding Corporatio — Valuation Comparison 2026

HVII

Electric Services
Hennessy Capital Investment Cor
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$10.42
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

SPRU

Electric Services
Spruce Power Holding Corporatio
Quality
6.5
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$2.86
Last close
Models
5/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HVII Fair ValueHVII Upside SPRU Fair ValueSPRU Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.78 -92.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.02 -90.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $1.80 -82.6% $3.64 +27.2%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $0.58 -94.4% $8.25 +193.6%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HVII vs SPRU — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HVII vs SPRU — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SPRU scores higher with a 6.5/10 quality rating vs HVII's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Hennessy Capital Investment Cor (HVII) and Spruce Power Holding Corporatio (SPRU) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HVII currently trades at $10.42 with a QOC of 4.7/10, while SPRU trades at $2.86 with a QOC of 6.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).