HURN vs LAWR

Huron Consulting Group Inc. vs Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. — Valuation Comparison 2026

HURN

Consulting Services
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$106.95
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

LAWR

Consulting Services
Robot Consulting Co., Ltd.
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$3.75
Last close
Models
7/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HURN Fair ValueHURN Upside LAWR Fair ValueLAWR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $58.17 -45.6% $1.01 -73.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $19.53 -81.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $51.52 -51.8% $3.69 -1.7%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HURN vs LAWR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HURN vs LAWR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HURN scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs LAWR's 5.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) and Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. (LAWR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HURN currently trades at $106.95 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while LAWR trades at $3.75 with a QOC of 5.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).