HLLY vs LEA

Holley Inc. vs Lear Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

HLLY

Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories
Holley Inc.
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$2.73
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

LEA

Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories
Lear Corporation
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$143.12
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HLLY Fair ValueHLLY Upside LEA Fair ValueLEA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.78 -71.4% $41.62 -70.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.16 -57.5% $135.73 -5.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HLLY vs LEA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HLLY vs LEA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HLLY scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs LEA's 8.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Holley Inc. (HLLY) and Lear Corporation (LEA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HLLY currently trades at $2.73 with a QOC of 9.3/10, while LEA trades at $143.12 with a QOC of 8.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).