HBM vs SCCO

Hudbay Minerals Inc. vs Southern Copper Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

HBM

Copper
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
Quality
2.2
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$28.23
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

SCCO

Copper
Southern Copper Corporation
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$194.88
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType HBM Fair ValueHBM Upside SCCO Fair ValueSCCO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $13.20 -53.2% $78.56 -59.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $10.60 -55.8% $55.52 -71.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for HBM vs SCCO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

HBM vs SCCO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SCCO scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs HBM's 2.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) and Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

HBM currently trades at $28.23 with a QOC of 2.2/10, while SCCO trades at $194.88 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).