Quick Summary — HBCP scores higher on quality with 9.0/10 vs HBANM's 8.3/10. HBANM trades at $21.10 while HBCP trades at $64.80. Both analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR data across 13 institutional models.
HBCP scores higher with a 9.0/10 quality rating vs HBANM's 8.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.
At $21.10, HBANM trades +62.1% above its Bayesian DCF fair value of $8.01, while HBCP at $64.80 trades +21.1% above its estimate of $51.15. HBANM shows a wider gap between price and intrinsic value.
HBANM earns a Quality of Company score of 8.3/10 compared to HBCP's 9.0/10. The scores are closely matched, indicating similar fundamental quality profiles. The QOC score synthesizes 32 signals spanning profitability margins, revenue growth, free cash flow, capital allocation, and leverage.
HBANM carries a SAFE value trap risk (18/100) while HBCP shows SAFE risk (8/100). Both companies show manageable value trap risk, suggesting their current valuations are not artificially depressed by fundamental deterioration.
Both HBANM and HBCP operate in Banks - Regional, which has 329 stocks tracked by CirclFi. Same-industry comparisons provide the most direct insight into relative valuation since both companies face similar regulatory environments, market dynamics, and competitive pressures. Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN), and ensemble methods (CUCE).
11 hidden models compare HBANM vs HBCP differently — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more. Some may disagree with the 2 you see above.
Bloomberg Terminal: ~$2,000/mo · FactSet: ~$1,000/mo · CirclFi: $0.90/day
See All 13 Models — $0.90/dayWe don’t predict prices. We show you what 13 independent mathematical frameworks say a stock is worth — and let you decide.