GSM vs HBM

Ferroglobe PLC vs Hudbay Minerals Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GSM

Metal Mining
Ferroglobe PLC
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$4.33
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

HBM

Metal Mining
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
Quality
2.2
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$29.16
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GSM Fair ValueGSM Upside HBM Fair ValueHBM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.07 -75.3% $10.06 -65.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $10.60 -55.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $0.52 -87.8% $3.32 -88.6%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GSM vs HBM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GSM vs HBM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HBM scores higher with a 2.2/10 quality rating vs GSM's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GSM currently trades at $4.33 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while HBM trades at $29.16 with a QOC of 2.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).