GSAT vs IRDM

Globalstar, Inc. vs Iridium Communications Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

GSAT

Communications Services, NEC
Globalstar, Inc.
Quality
7.4
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$84.21
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

IRDM

Communications Services, NEC
Iridium Communications Inc
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$51.78
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GSAT Fair ValueGSAT Upside IRDM Fair ValueIRDM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $62.21 -26.1% $40.32 -22.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.86 -99.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $10.18 -87.9% $3.01 -94.2%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GSAT vs IRDM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GSAT vs IRDM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IRDM scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs GSAT's 7.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) and Iridium Communications Inc (IRDM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GSAT currently trades at $84.21 with a QOC of 7.4/10, while IRDM trades at $51.78 with a QOC of 8.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).