GPI vs JZXN

Group 1 Automotive, Inc. vs Jiuzi Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GPI

Auto & Truck Dealerships
Group 1 Automotive, Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
14
SAFE
Price
$326.44
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

JZXN

Auto & Truck Dealerships
Jiuzi Holdings, Inc.
Quality
1.4
out of 10
Value Trap
15
SAFE
Price
$1.14
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GPI Fair ValueGPI Upside JZXN Fair ValueJZXN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $803.65 +146.2% $0.23 -80.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $220.23 -32.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $566.74 +73.6% $1.04 +17.9%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GPI vs JZXN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GPI vs JZXN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GPI scores higher with a 8.5/10 quality rating vs JZXN's 1.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Group 1 Automotive, Inc. (GPI) and Jiuzi Holdings, Inc. (JZXN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GPI currently trades at $326.44 with a QOC of 8.5/10, while JZXN trades at $1.14 with a QOC of 1.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).