GPC vs INEO

Genuine Parts Company vs INNEOVA Holdings Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

GPC

Auto Parts
Genuine Parts Company
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
14
SAFE
Price
$99.26
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

INEO

Auto Parts
INNEOVA Holdings Limited
Quality
2.3
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$0.61
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GPC Fair ValueGPC Upside INEO Fair ValueINEO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $25.50 -74.3% $0.16 -73.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $28.33 -71.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $31.77 -68.0% $0.15 -74.9%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GPC vs INEO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GPC vs INEO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GPC scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs INEO's 2.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Genuine Parts Company (GPC) and INNEOVA Holdings Limited (INEO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GPC currently trades at $99.26 with a QOC of 8.2/10, while INEO trades at $0.61 with a QOC of 2.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).