GOF vs GUG

Guggenheim Strategic Opportunit vs GUG — Valuation Comparison 2026

GOF

Asset Management
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunit
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$11.16
Last close
Models
6/13
Active
VS

GUG

Asset Management
GUG
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$16.31
Last close
Models
6/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GOF Fair ValueGOF Upside GUG Fair ValueGUG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.29 -70.5% $4.32 -73.5%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $21.15 +88.5% $15.15 -5.3%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GOF vs GUG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GOF vs GUG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

Both GOF and GUG score 1.7/10 on quality. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Guggenheim Strategic Opportunit (GOF) and GUG (GUG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GOF currently trades at $11.16 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while GUG trades at $16.31 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).