GOCO vs HIT

GoHealth, Inc. vs Health In Tech, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GOCO

Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service
GoHealth, Inc.
Quality
6.0
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$0.64
Last close
Models
3/13
Active
VS

HIT

Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service
Health In Tech, Inc.
Quality
9.1
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$0.99
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GOCO Fair ValueGOCO Upside HIT Fair ValueHIT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.95 -4.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.31 -68.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $1.87 +118.9% $0.27 -72.8%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $3.44 +209.7% $0.96 -3.1%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GOCO vs HIT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GOCO vs HIT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HIT scores higher with a 9.1/10 quality rating vs GOCO's 6.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing GoHealth, Inc. (GOCO) and Health In Tech, Inc. (HIT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GOCO currently trades at $0.64 with a QOC of 6.0/10, while HIT trades at $0.99 with a QOC of 9.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).