GLE vs HCKT

Global Engine Group Holding Lim vs The Hackett Group, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GLE

Information Technology Services
Global Engine Group Holding Lim
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
21
SAFE
Price
$0.45
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

HCKT

Information Technology Services
The Hackett Group, Inc.
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
28
LOW
Price
$11.37
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GLE Fair ValueGLE Upside HCKT Fair ValueHCKT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.19 -57.5% $22.72 +99.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.03 -91.1% $1.66 -88.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GLE vs HCKT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GLE vs HCKT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HCKT scores higher with a 7.6/10 quality rating vs GLE's 6.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Global Engine Group Holding Lim (GLE) and The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GLE currently trades at $0.45 with a QOC of 6.3/10, while HCKT trades at $11.37 with a QOC of 7.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).