GLBS vs GSL

Globus Maritime Limited vs Global Ship Lease Inc New — Valuation Comparison 2026

GLBS

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Globus Maritime Limited
Quality
5.1
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$2.03
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

GSL

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Global Ship Lease Inc New
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$36.43
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GLBS Fair ValueGLBS Upside GSL Fair ValueGSL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.94 +94.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.40 -30.8% $131.68 +261.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $5.25 +158.5% $69.79 +91.6%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GLBS vs GSL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GLBS vs GSL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GSL scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs GLBS's 5.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) and Global Ship Lease Inc New (GSL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GLBS currently trades at $2.03 with a QOC of 5.1/10, while GSL trades at $36.43 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).