GASS vs HTCO

StealthGas, Inc. vs High-Trend International Group — Valuation Comparison 2026

GASS

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
StealthGas, Inc.
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$9.30
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

HTCO

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
High-Trend International Group
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$3.15
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GASS Fair ValueGASS Upside HTCO Fair ValueHTCO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $30.40 +226.9% $1.16 -63.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $19.12 +105.6% $2.80 -64.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GASS vs HTCO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GASS vs HTCO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GASS scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs HTCO's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing StealthGas, Inc. (GASS) and High-Trend International Group (HTCO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GASS currently trades at $9.30 with a QOC of 9.6/10, while HTCO trades at $3.15 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).