GASS vs GLBS

StealthGas, Inc. vs Globus Maritime Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

GASS

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
StealthGas, Inc.
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$9.18
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

GLBS

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
Globus Maritime Limited
Quality
5.1
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$2.03
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GASS Fair ValueGASS Upside GLBS Fair ValueGLBS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $30.40 +231.2% $3.94 +94.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $19.12 +108.3% $1.40 -30.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GASS vs GLBS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GASS vs GLBS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GASS scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs GLBS's 5.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing StealthGas, Inc. (GASS) and Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GASS currently trades at $9.18 with a QOC of 9.6/10, while GLBS trades at $2.03 with a QOC of 5.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).