GAME vs GMHS

GameSquare Holdings, Inc. vs Gamehaus Holdings Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

GAME

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
GameSquare Holdings, Inc.
Quality
5.1
out of 10
Value Trap
29
LOW
Price
$0.41
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

GMHS

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Gamehaus Holdings Inc.
Quality
2.2
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$0.93
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType GAME Fair ValueGAME Upside GMHS Fair ValueGMHS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.01 -97.5% $0.25 -73.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.30 -39.6% $0.12 -88.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for GAME vs GMHS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

GAME vs GMHS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GAME scores higher with a 5.1/10 quality rating vs GMHS's 2.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing GameSquare Holdings, Inc. (GAME) and Gamehaus Holdings Inc. (GMHS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

GAME currently trades at $0.41 with a QOC of 5.1/10, while GMHS trades at $0.93 with a QOC of 2.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).