FTNT vs INVE

Fortinet, Inc. vs Identiv, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FTNT

Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC
Fortinet, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$137.97
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

INVE

Computer Peripheral Equipment, NEC
Identiv, Inc.
Quality
5.5
out of 10
Value Trap
14
SAFE
Price
$4.10
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FTNT Fair ValueFTNT Upside INVE Fair ValueINVE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $59.67 -56.8% $3.61 -11.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $26.74 -80.6% $7.20 +45.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FTNT vs INVE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FTNT vs INVE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FTNT scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs INVE's 5.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) and Identiv, Inc. (INVE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FTNT currently trades at $137.97 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while INVE trades at $4.10 with a QOC of 5.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).