FTI vs LSE

TechnipFMC plc vs Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd — Valuation Comparison 2026

FTI

Oil & Gas Field Machinery & Equipment
TechnipFMC plc
Quality
9.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$68.42
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

LSE

Oil & Gas Field Machinery & Equipment
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd
Quality
2.2
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$4.49
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FTI Fair ValueFTI Upside LSE Fair ValueLSE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $38.32 -44.0% $1.24 -72.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $37.40 -45.3% $2.13 -59.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FTI vs LSE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FTI vs LSE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FTI scores higher with a 9.5/10 quality rating vs LSE's 2.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing TechnipFMC plc (FTI) and Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd (LSE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FTI currently trades at $68.42 with a QOC of 9.5/10, while LSE trades at $4.49 with a QOC of 2.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).