FTHM vs LRHC

Fathom Holdings Inc. vs La Rosa Holdings Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FTHM

Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others)
Fathom Holdings Inc.
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
37
LOW
Price
$0.57
Last close
Models
4/13
Active
VS

LRHC

Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others)
La Rosa Holdings Corp.
Quality
5.1
out of 10
Value Trap
31
LOW
Price
$1.31
Last close
Models
3/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FTHM Fair ValueFTHM Upside LRHC Fair ValueLRHC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.21 -63.4% $1.99 -8.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $0.54 -5.3% $0.09 -95.0%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $0.14 -75.6%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FTHM vs LRHC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FTHM vs LRHC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FTHM scores higher with a 5.7/10 quality rating vs LRHC's 5.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) and La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FTHM currently trades at $0.57 with a QOC of 5.7/10, while LRHC trades at $1.31 with a QOC of 5.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).