FSOL vs PHYS

Fidelity Solana Fund vs "Sprott Physical Gold Trust" — Valuation Comparison 2026

FSOL

Commodity Contracts Brokers & Dealers
Fidelity Solana Fund
Quality
3.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$9.67
Last close
Models
4/13
Active
VS

PHYS

Commodity Contracts Brokers & Dealers
"Sprott Physical Gold Trust"
Quality
6.2
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$34.01
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FSOL Fair ValueFSOL Upside PHYS Fair ValuePHYS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $80.30 +136.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $158.92 +367.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $8.36 -13.5%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $4.92 -49.1% $16.78 -50.7%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FSOL vs PHYS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FSOL vs PHYS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PHYS scores higher with a 6.2/10 quality rating vs FSOL's 3.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and "Sprott Physical Gold Trust" (PHYS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FSOL currently trades at $9.67 with a QOC of 3.0/10, while PHYS trades at $34.01 with a QOC of 6.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).