FOXX vs WLDS

Foxx Development Holdings Inc. vs Wearable Devices Ltd. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FOXX

Computer Communications Equipment
Foxx Development Holdings Inc.
Quality
5.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$2.63
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

WLDS

Computer Communications Equipment
Wearable Devices Ltd.
Quality
5.4
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$0.94
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FOXX Fair ValueFOXX Upside WLDS Fair ValueWLDS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.93 -64.5% $0.75 -20.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.04 -58.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $3.02 +14.8% $0.02 -97.5%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FOXX vs WLDS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FOXX vs WLDS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FOXX scores higher with a 5.5/10 quality rating vs WLDS's 5.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Foxx Development Holdings Inc. (FOXX) and Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FOXX currently trades at $2.63 with a QOC of 5.5/10, while WLDS trades at $0.94 with a QOC of 5.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).