FORTY vs GLOB

Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. vs Globant S.A. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FORTY

Information Technology Services
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
Quality
1.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$132.54
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

GLOB

Information Technology Services
Globant S.A.
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$39.93
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FORTY Fair ValueFORTY Upside GLOB Fair ValueGLOB Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $39.12 -70.5% $67.13 +68.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $146.76 -1.0% $23.54 -41.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FORTY vs GLOB — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FORTY vs GLOB — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GLOB scores higher with a 7.8/10 quality rating vs FORTY's 1.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. (FORTY) and Globant S.A. (GLOB) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FORTY currently trades at $132.54 with a QOC of 1.8/10, while GLOB trades at $39.93 with a QOC of 7.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).