FORA vs GDRX

Forian Inc. vs GoodRx Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FORA

Health Information Services
Forian Inc.
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$2.17
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

GDRX

Health Information Services
GoodRx Holdings, Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
35
LOW
Price
$2.97
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FORA Fair ValueFORA Upside GDRX Fair ValueGDRX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.57 -27.7% $9.08 +205.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.20 -44.1% $1.54 -48.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FORA vs GDRX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FORA vs GDRX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GDRX scores higher with a 7.7/10 quality rating vs FORA's 6.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Forian Inc. (FORA) and GoodRx Holdings, Inc. (GDRX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FORA currently trades at $2.17 with a QOC of 6.9/10, while GDRX trades at $2.97 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).