Quick Summary — FLNT scores higher on quality with 4.8/10 vs HAO's 2.1/10. FLNT trades at $2.54 while HAO trades at $1.23. Both analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR data across 13 institutional models.
FLNT scores higher with a 4.8/10 quality rating vs HAO's 2.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.
At $2.54, FLNT trades +52.9% above its Bayesian DCF fair value of $1.20, while HAO at $1.23 trades +74.1% above its estimate of $0.32. HAO shows a wider gap between price and intrinsic value.
FLNT earns a Quality of Company score of 4.8/10 compared to HAO's 2.1/10. This moderate difference suggests one company has an edge in fundamental quality, though both may offer investment merit depending on valuation. The QOC score synthesizes 32 signals spanning profitability margins, revenue growth, free cash flow, capital allocation, and leverage.
Review the value trap analysis for both FLNT and HAO to assess whether apparent undervaluation reflects genuine opportunity or hidden fundamental risk.
Both FLNT and HAO operate in Advertising Agencies, which has 41 stocks tracked by CirclFi. Same-industry comparisons provide the most direct insight into relative valuation since both companies face similar regulatory environments, market dynamics, and competitive pressures. Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN), and ensemble methods (CUCE).
11 hidden models compare FLNT vs HAO differently — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more. Some may disagree with the 2 you see above.
Bloomberg Terminal: ~$2,000/mo · FactSet: ~$1,000/mo · CirclFi: $0.90/day
See All 13 Models — $0.90/dayWe don’t predict prices. We show you what 13 independent mathematical frameworks say a stock is worth — and let you decide.