FLGT vs ILMN

Fulgent Genetics, Inc. vs Illumina, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FLGT

Diagnostics & Research
Fulgent Genetics, Inc.
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$18.24
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

ILMN

Diagnostics & Research
Illumina, Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$158.70
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FLGT Fair ValueFLGT Upside ILMN Fair ValueILMN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $62.09 +240.4% $53.07 -66.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $24.12 +32.2% $131.24 -17.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FLGT vs ILMN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FLGT vs ILMN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ILMN scores higher with a 8.5/10 quality rating vs FLGT's 7.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (FLGT) and Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FLGT currently trades at $18.24 with a QOC of 7.1/10, while ILMN trades at $158.70 with a QOC of 8.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).