FKWL vs GILT

Franklin Wireless Corp. vs Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FKWL

Communication Equipment
Franklin Wireless Corp.
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$2.98
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

GILT

Communication Equipment
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
11
SAFE
Price
$17.83
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FKWL Fair ValueFKWL Upside GILT Fair ValueGILT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.33 -88.8% $1.03 -94.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.04 -18.5% $5.23 -70.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FKWL vs GILT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FKWL vs GILT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GILT scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs FKWL's 6.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Franklin Wireless Corp. (FKWL) and Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FKWL currently trades at $2.98 with a QOC of 6.3/10, while GILT trades at $17.83 with a QOC of 8.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).