FHI vs FMN

Federated Hermes, Inc. vs Federated Premier Municipal Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

FHI

Asset Management
Federated Hermes, Inc.
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$55.47
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

FMN

Asset Management
Federated Premier Municipal Inc
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$11.25
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FHI Fair ValueFHI Upside FMN Fair ValueFMN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $41.69 -24.8% $2.98 -73.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $42.62 -23.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $6.08 -45.3%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FHI vs FMN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FHI vs FMN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FHI scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs FMN's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) and Federated Premier Municipal Inc (FMN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FHI currently trades at $55.47 with a QOC of 9.2/10, while FMN trades at $11.25 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).