FCN vs FORR

FTI Consulting, Inc. vs Forrester Research, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

FCN

Consulting Services
FTI Consulting, Inc.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$154.90
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

FORR

Consulting Services
Forrester Research, Inc.
Quality
6.4
out of 10
Value Trap
16
SAFE
Price
$6.97
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType FCN Fair ValueFCN Upside FORR Fair ValueFORR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $18.95 -87.8% $21.40 +207.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $48.61 -68.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $147.22 -5.0% $1.69 -75.7%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for FCN vs FORR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

FCN vs FORR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FCN scores higher with a 8.1/10 quality rating vs FORR's 6.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) and Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

FCN currently trades at $154.90 with a QOC of 8.1/10, while FORR trades at $6.97 with a QOC of 6.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).