EXEL vs FATE

Exelixis, Inc. vs Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

EXEL

Biotechnology
Exelixis, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$51.45
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

FATE

Biotechnology
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.
Quality
5.5
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$2.63
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EXEL Fair ValueEXEL Upside FATE Fair ValueFATE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $43.90 -14.7% $0.62 -76.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $29.37 -42.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $44.22 -14.1% $0.18 -88.1%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EXEL vs FATE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EXEL vs FATE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EXEL scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs FATE's 5.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Exelixis, Inc. (EXEL) and Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EXEL currently trades at $51.45 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while FATE trades at $2.63 with a QOC of 5.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).