ETV vs EVG

Eaton Vance Corporation Eaton V vs Eaton Vance Short Diversified I — Valuation Comparison 2026

ETV

Asset Management
Eaton Vance Corporation Eaton V
Quality
1.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$14.80
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

EVG

Asset Management
Eaton Vance Short Diversified I
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$10.76
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ETV Fair ValueETV Upside EVG Fair ValueEVG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.92 -73.5% $2.85 -73.5%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $18.26 +23.4% $7.78 -27.7%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ETV vs EVG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ETV vs EVG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ETV scores higher with a 1.8/10 quality rating vs EVG's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Eaton Vance Corporation Eaton V (ETV) and Eaton Vance Short Diversified I (EVG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ETV currently trades at $14.80 with a QOC of 1.8/10, while EVG trades at $10.76 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).