ETN vs SMX

Eaton Corporation, PLC vs SMX (Security Matters) Public L — Valuation Comparison 2026

ETN

Misc Industrial & Commercial Machinery & Equipment
Eaton Corporation, PLC
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$400.60
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

SMX

Misc Industrial & Commercial Machinery & Equipment
SMX (Security Matters) Public L
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$7.00
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ETN Fair ValueETN Upside SMX Fair ValueSMX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $35.55 -91.1% $2.02 -71.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $50.32 -87.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $364.48 -9.0% $12.58 +79.6%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ETN vs SMX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ETN vs SMX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ETN scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs SMX's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Eaton Corporation, PLC (ETN) and SMX (Security Matters) Public L (SMX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ETN currently trades at $400.60 with a QOC of 9.2/10, while SMX trades at $7.00 with a QOC of 2.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).