ESPR vs HIMS

Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. vs Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ESPR

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
Quality
5.2
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$3.13
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

HIMS

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
Quality
6.7
out of 10
Value Trap
35
LOW
Price
$25.38
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ESPR Fair ValueESPR Upside HIMS Fair ValueHIMS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.09 -65.0% $14.62 -42.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.51 -87.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $2.33 -25.7% $22.52 -11.3%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ESPR vs HIMS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ESPR vs HIMS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

HIMS scores higher with a 6.7/10 quality rating vs ESPR's 5.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. (ESPR) and Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ESPR currently trades at $3.13 with a QOC of 5.2/10, while HIMS trades at $25.38 with a QOC of 6.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).