ESPR vs FBIO

Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. vs Fortress Biotech, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ESPR

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
Quality
5.2
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$3.13
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

FBIO

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Fortress Biotech, Inc.
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$2.80
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ESPR Fair ValueESPR Upside FBIO Fair ValueFBIO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.10 -65.0% $4.87 +73.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.96 +70.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $6.15 +96.5% $2.84 +2.1%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ESPR vs FBIO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ESPR vs FBIO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FBIO scores higher with a 5.9/10 quality rating vs ESPR's 5.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. (ESPR) and Fortress Biotech, Inc. (FBIO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ESPR currently trades at $3.13 with a QOC of 5.2/10, while FBIO trades at $2.80 with a QOC of 5.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).