ESBA vs ESS

Empire State Realty OP, L.P. Se vs Essex Property Trust, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ESBA

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Empire State Realty OP, L.P. Se
Quality
6.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$5.50
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

ESS

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Essex Property Trust, Inc.
Quality
8.0
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$272.64
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ESBA Fair ValueESBA Upside ESS Fair ValueESS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.19 -96.6% $85.80 -68.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.08 -62.2% $5.95 -97.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ESBA vs ESS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ESBA vs ESS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ESS scores higher with a 8.0/10 quality rating vs ESBA's 6.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Empire State Realty OP, L.P. Se (ESBA) and Essex Property Trust, Inc. (ESS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ESBA currently trades at $5.50 with a QOC of 6.0/10, while ESS trades at $272.64 with a QOC of 8.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).