EPD vs KGS

Enterprise Products Partners L. vs Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

EPD

Natural Gas Transmission
Enterprise Products Partners L.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$36.79
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

KGS

Natural Gas Transmission
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$66.85
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EPD Fair ValueEPD Upside KGS Fair ValueKGS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $31.60 -14.1% $10.58 -85.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $11.59 -68.5% $2.78 -96.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EPD vs KGS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EPD vs KGS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KGS scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs EPD's 8.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Enterprise Products Partners L. (EPD) and Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. (KGS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EPD currently trades at $36.79 with a QOC of 8.5/10, while KGS trades at $66.85 with a QOC of 8.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).