EOS vs EQH

Eaton Vance Enhance Equity Inco vs Equitable Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

EOS

Asset Management
Eaton Vance Enhance Equity Inco
Quality
1.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$22.93
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

EQH

Asset Management
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$41.08
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EOS Fair ValueEOS Upside EQH Fair ValueEQH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $6.07 -73.5% $58.69 +42.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $41.79 -0.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $29.09 +26.9% $126.52 +208.0%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EOS vs EQH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EOS vs EQH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EQH scores higher with a 6.3/10 quality rating vs EOS's 1.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Eaton Vance Enhance Equity Inco (EOS) and Equitable Holdings, Inc. (EQH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EOS currently trades at $22.93 with a QOC of 1.8/10, while EQH trades at $41.08 with a QOC of 6.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).