EOLS vs ERAS

Evolus, Inc. Common Stock vs Erasca, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

EOLS

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Evolus, Inc. Common Stock
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$6.56
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

ERAS

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Erasca, Inc.
Quality
4.2
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$12.84
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EOLS Fair ValueEOLS Upside ERAS Fair ValueERAS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.14 -82.6% $3.40 -73.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.70 -30.5% $9.40 -56.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EOLS vs ERAS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EOLS vs ERAS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EOLS scores higher with a 5.9/10 quality rating vs ERAS's 4.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Evolus, Inc. Common Stock (EOLS) and Erasca, Inc. (ERAS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EOLS currently trades at $6.56 with a QOC of 5.9/10, while ERAS trades at $12.84 with a QOC of 4.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).