ENR vs FLUX

Energizer Holdings, Inc. vs Flux Power Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ENR

Miscellaneous Electrical Machinery, Equipment & Supplies
Energizer Holdings, Inc.
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$18.22
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

FLUX

Miscellaneous Electrical Machinery, Equipment & Supplies
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
Quality
5.8
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$1.08
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ENR Fair ValueENR Upside FLUX Fair ValueFLUX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.02 -98.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.12 +61.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $3.22 -82.3% $0.09 -93.4%
First Chicago Scenario $4.41 -76.2% $4.22 +291.1%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ENR vs FLUX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ENR vs FLUX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ENR scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs FLUX's 5.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) and Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ENR currently trades at $18.22 with a QOC of 8.7/10, while FLUX trades at $1.08 with a QOC of 5.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).