Is ELC or EMP more undervalued in 2026?

CirclFi compares Entergy Louisiana, Inc. Collate (ELC) and Entergy Mississippi, LLC First (EMP) using 13 institutional-grade valuation models. ELC has a Quality of Company score of 1.6/10 while EMP scores 1.6/10.

Which is a better buy — ELC or EMP?

Compare intrinsic values from 13 independent models against current market prices. CirclFi also calculates Value Trap scores. This is not financial advice — conduct your own analysis.

How do ELC and EMP valuations compare?

ELC at $20.10 and EMP at $20.75 are compared across Bayesian DCF, EPV, EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, and 8 additional models.

ELC vs EMP Valuation Comparison 2026 — Intrinsic Value Analysis

ELC

Electric Services

Entergy Louisiana, Inc. Collate

Quality

1.6

out of 10

Value Trap

—

Price

$20.10

Last close

Models

0/13

Active

EMP

Electric Services

Entergy Mississippi, LLC First

Quality

1.6

out of 10

Value Trap

—

Price

$20.75

Last close

Models

0/13

Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

Model	Type	ELC Fair Value	ELC Upside	EMP Fair Value	EMP Upside

🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ELC vs EMP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ELC vs EMP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

Both ELC and EMP score 1.6/10 on quality. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Entergy Louisiana, Inc. Collate (ELC) and Entergy Mississippi, LLC First (EMP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ELC currently trades at $20.10 with a QOC of 1.6/10, while EMP trades at $20.75 with a QOC of 1.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).