EEFT vs USIO

Euronet Worldwide, Inc. vs Usio, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

EEFT

Functions Related To Depository Banking, NEC
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$72.48
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

USIO

Functions Related To Depository Banking, NEC
Usio, Inc.
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$1.61
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EEFT Fair ValueEEFT Upside USIO Fair ValueUSIO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $226.47 +212.5% $0.74 -54.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $48.69 -32.8% $0.71 -56.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EEFT vs USIO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EEFT vs USIO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EEFT scores higher with a 8.1/10 quality rating vs USIO's 7.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Euronet Worldwide, Inc. (EEFT) and Usio, Inc. (USIO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EEFT currently trades at $72.48 with a QOC of 8.1/10, while USIO trades at $1.61 with a QOC of 7.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).