EDTK vs FC

Skillful Craftsman Education Te vs Franklin Covey Company — Valuation Comparison 2026

EDTK

Education & Training Services
Skillful Craftsman Education Te
Quality
2.4
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.00
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

FC

Education & Training Services
Franklin Covey Company
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$24.02
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EDTK Fair ValueEDTK Upside FC Fair ValueFC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.20 -79.6% $31.49 +31.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.53 -47.3% $5.46 -77.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EDTK vs FC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EDTK vs FC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FC scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs EDTK's 2.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Skillful Craftsman Education Te (EDTK) and Franklin Covey Company (FC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EDTK currently trades at $1.00 with a QOC of 2.4/10, while FC trades at $24.02 with a QOC of 8.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).