EDHL vs FLNT

Everbright Digital Holding Limi vs Fluent, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

EDHL

Advertising Agencies
Everbright Digital Holding Limi
Quality
2.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$3.10
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

FLNT

Advertising Agencies
Fluent, Inc.
Quality
4.8
out of 10
Value Trap
29
LOW
Price
$2.17
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EDHL Fair ValueEDHL Upside FLNT Fair ValueFLNT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.61 -80.3% $1.26 -42.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.38 -84.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $3.80 +32.0% $0.22 -90.1%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EDHL vs FLNT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EDHL vs FLNT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FLNT scores higher with a 4.8/10 quality rating vs EDHL's 2.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Everbright Digital Holding Limi (EDHL) and Fluent, Inc. (FLNT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EDHL currently trades at $3.10 with a QOC of 2.5/10, while FLNT trades at $2.17 with a QOC of 4.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).